103 Comments

The Russians have to be very skeptical about whether the US/NATO/Ukraine axis is even 'agreement capable.' The Minsk agreement was used as a subterfuge to buy time to build-up the Ukraine armed forces; no one besides the Russians had any intend to honor this agreement. Trust is going to be in very short supply all the way around. Any negotiations, as Mr. Bryen suggests, is going to have many parts to discuss. This could take years (but first the fighting has to stop).

Good luck!

Expand full comment

Given that the West is not "agreement capable" my belief is that the Russians will build two bases in (what's left of) Ukraine to enforce neutrality, demilitarization and deNazification. For the sake of security, I should think these installations would be located along the Belarus and the Transnistrian border.

Expand full comment

Well at least there is now someone Russia can negotiate with.

Expand full comment

Indeed, Stephen Brian. I wrote this in my comment on Asia Times. But Asia Times strangely did not publish my recommendation.

Expand full comment

You say that no one seems to have any idea what the Russians want. That's not quite true--the Russians have been extremely open about exactly what their goals are for the SMO. "Negotiations" are not being sought to find out what they want, only to explore whether nor not they can be persuaded to settle for something less.

On the other hand (leaving Ukraine itself aside for a moment), what the West wants is pretty clear. They want something that allows them to "lose without losing." (Good luck with that.) But I don't think the Russians will agree to anything that can't be accompanied by some kind of verification and enforcement mechanism. The "trust" bank is broke now.

Trump's best move might be to just shut off the money and weapons spigot and tell Zelensky he's on his own if he doesn't want to negotiate. Europe is probably dumb enough to try to keep the game going awhile longer, giving Zelensky a tiny bit of time to negotiate before he collapses completely.

Expand full comment

<<<<<Negotiations" are not being sought to find out what they want, only to explore whether nor not they can be persuaded to settle for something less<<<<<< In other words, try to find out Russia really wants. Which is something different now than proposals made two years ago and probably is still being adjusted as events on the ground give them improved opportunities to expand their *wants*.

Expand full comment

Trump should honor the promise made by the George H W Bush administration about NATO not moving a inch east by refusing admission to the Ukraine.

Expand full comment

Here’s a radical idea. How about asking the Ukrainian people what they want with a free and fair election of a new government. After all, Zelenskyy doesn’t represent anyone but himself.

Expand full comment

After both Minsk and the Istanbul Agreements, any proposal will need to be offered by Russia, on Russian terms. Or else, Russia will continue to transact the SMO to its conclusion.

Expand full comment

"Russia will continue to transact the SMO to its conclusion"

IMO... that's the most likely scenario for how events will transpire.

Expand full comment

Define conclusion. Russia taking over and occupying Ukraine? Managing a hostile population while rebuilding it? Scratch that as long as Putin is in power.

Expand full comment

What population? there is only women, kids and old people left. The rest is either dead or lives abroad.

Expand full comment

Ummm....unlike previous failed arrangements, negotiations etc. there is now an American President that many people are convinced will start kicking ass if he doesn't find a solution. Whether he would or not doesn't matter. Important people, important to the process, believe he just might do it. So people important to the process now believe maybe it's time to get busy, what ever that means to them.

Expand full comment

It doesn't matter. There will be no deal. Not only has Trump surrounded his tomfool self with neocons, anything other than total Russian capitulation will have Team D howling "Putin Puppet!"

As we saw in North Korea and Syria, Trump is weak, stupid and easily manipulated. He will fold.

Expand full comment

I haven't noticed Trump surrounding himself with neocons - yet.

He was pretty rude about Liz and Dick last Thursday, as well as Bolton. And JD has been consistently critical of of the hawks who jumped ship from the GOP to the Dems under Killary and Sleepy Joe - who made Cheney Sr's foreign policy advisor and NATO expansionist Mrs Kagan number two at State.

But the neocons are still a powerful well-connected force, and will of course try their worst to now jump ship from the Dems back to the Trump GOP.

After all, they don't give a sh*t about domestic policy divisions, only about full spectrum dominance abroad and linked defense contracts back home, under any administration they can suborn.

Expand full comment

Pompeo, Cotton and Brian Hook all qualify as neocons,m and Trump has had them around him in recent days.

Expand full comment

Bingo Finster

Expand full comment

In the last few days Trump has ditched Pompeo, and his new Ukraine point-man has tweeted “The senseless killing will end soon. Time is up for the warmonger profiteers.”

I hope Elon has good security.

Expand full comment

I hope to God that this comes to pass, hut we've gotten our hopes up in vain before.

Expand full comment

so J D Vance, Tulsi, JFK Jr , Musk are now "neocons"?

Expand full comment

Pompeo, Cotton and Brian whaisface (to give the first three names.to come.to mind) are.

Expand full comment

Can’t argue with that, ff. For all the positive moves wrt to his domestic policy, it would appear that the US’ foreign policy idiocy will continue. Creating war and unrest all over the world.

Expand full comment

I am Russian and I will tell you what Russia wants in the former Ukraine. Since the West is incapable of negotiating, leaving at least a small piece of the former Ukraine means simply postponing the war for the future. The former Ukraine should be completely abolished and incorporated into Russia as regions. This is the only way to achieve lasting peace. Well, "sanctions" are all nonsense, the Western minority cannot isolate the largest country in the World, the West can only isolate itself from it.

Expand full comment

I thought when the war started that the Russian stop line would be the Dnieper River. I think it's gone on too long for that now. I think Russia will take all of Ukraine except possibly a sliver on the western side as a buffer. The real shame is that the West didn't agree not to bring Ukraine into NATO. Russia has said for almost two decades that trying to bring Ukraine into NATO was a red line they would go to war to prevent.

Expand full comment
Nov 8Edited

I think it's better to not incorporate it into Russia. You really don't want to clean up the corruption there. Also, incorporating it, would mean you would be paying for rebuilding the country. I doubt the UKs will be grateful, they will just see you as a conqueror that killed all their sons/fathers. They won't realize it's mainly the West that kept the fight going.

Just make it a vassal state with a friendly government. And keep a close watch.

Expand full comment

This option is also possible and it is operable, but it is less reliable. We are already used to rebuilding the country, we have done it many times. Besides, Ukraine is not a stranger to us, it is our ancestral land, our lost people are there. And after the change of one generation and proper indoctrination, the local population will curse the Western colonialists, not us.

Expand full comment

I admire your optimism !

Expand full comment

We just need to not let this matter take its course, as we did at the end of the last and the beginning of this century. And it's not worth living without optimism.

Expand full comment

As an expat who was living in Ukraine when the SMO started- it is my view that it is the west the soon to be former Ukrainians will come to hate.

The simple fact is the "west" used Ukraine as a battering ram against Russia and used Ukrainians as cannon fodder for the benefit of the west.

At no point did the western leaders care about the people of Ukraine.

Now Ukrainians begin to understand this.

Russia offers Ukrainians a far better future than the west does.

Expand full comment

It is a pity that not all Ukrainians understand this yet.

Expand full comment

Trump would be well advised to steer clear of Ukraine. Stephen correctly laid out Russia's wartime objectives. I would add that Russia also may need permanent bases in Ukraine to enforce compliance with demands for Ukrainian NATO neutrality. The US will be outraged with the outcome -- which will be dictated on the battlefield-- but is powerless to reverse. Therefore, Trump should keep his distance and not allow himself to be tarnished.

Expand full comment

That’s smart. Trump should stay out of that nest of anacondas until there is a path whose end is NOT political disaster.

Expand full comment

One of the many "experts on Russia", interpretation of the "wishlist" (requirements !) Russia and, a "person" (Trump?!), "capable of concluding a "good deal" to mitigate and minimize these fair ("tough") demands!? However, the "experts" are stuck in the 90s and cannot understand one "little thing": in order to start negotiating with Russia, it is necessary to fulfill its requirements! That 's all ! These will be the initial signs of America & Co's ability to negotiate. As the Russian proverb says, "Living with wolves is like howling wolves." Therefore, under the current circumstances, it is naive to expect a "miracle" from the president of the United States, whoever he is (Johnny Depp?)... Waiting for concessions and softening from Russia on Ukraine is not worth wasting time...

Expand full comment

I don't interpret. I explain. Have a nice day.

Expand full comment

Good.Only , you did not explain - on what basis should the lost trust be restored ? Where is the beginning of the "amnesty" of long-term deception? Indeed , the conditions put forward by Russia are simple and tough .But this should not be misleading: supposedly, for Russia , this is the maximum from which you can reduce rates .No, this is just the minimum , from the unconditional fulfillment of which it will be possible to talk about anything and with anyone ! Personalities and governments don 't matter at all . Good health!

Expand full comment

We live in a tragicomic world...

After Putin and the Russians have been demonized incessantly (as has Trump), we can expect the presentation of the (so far negative) characters to undergo changes similar to those that appeared in Le Moniteur Universel in March 1815, after Napoleon's escape from Elba Island:

- March 9 - "The monster has escaped from his place of exile"

- March 13 - "The tyrant is now in Lyon. Everyone was seized with fear at his appearance."

- March 19 - "Bonaparte is advancing in a forced march, but it is impossible for him to reach Paris."

- March 21 - The Emperor Napoleon is at Fontainebleau."

- March 22 - "Yesterday evening, His Majesty the Emperor made his public entrance into Paris.

Nothing can surpass the joy of everyone."

Expand full comment

Does it matter what Trump does? Does the USA have any agency in this conflict?

Expand full comment

Yes, US $$$ is the glue holding Kiev regime together, and US/NATO weapons supplies are the reason fighting drags out over many years

Expand full comment

No, the US has no say in the outcome. Unless, of course, the US enters the field of combat... which is highly unlikely.

Expand full comment

I don't think the Russians care if Ukraine joins the EU. Perhaps because they know that Ukraine will not get into the EU or in the alternative, that the EU is doomed long term.

Expand full comment

In the past Russia was willing to concede EU membership for Ukraine. I doubt that is the case now given the EU's strong anti-Russian stand and financing of the war machine.

Expand full comment

Yes. It should be noted that the EU has been making noises about the creation of some kind of unified EU military presence.

Expand full comment

The opposite might actually happen. The Russians might demand that Ukraine be granted EU membership on a fixed and accelerated schedule. Dangling potential membership is the main mean employed by the West to get politicians hostile to Russia elected. I think the Russians are smart enough to strip us of that.

Expand full comment

Russia’s number 1 goal will be to eliminate any chance that Ukraine is left to rebuild itself as another NATO proxy. That will override everything else.

Expand full comment

Mr. Bryen, I do appreciate you mentioning the faith and the Russian Orthodox Church.

I also remember President Trump crossing the street to go to the church amongst the D.C. protests. Holding the Bible. Then Biden in his aviation glasses at the photo-shoot in front of the Kiev's golden domes. Many things went down in between. Did anyone ask what American people want in the terms of foreign policy?

Expand full comment

The existing Congress still supports weapons and money for Ukraine. But it seems to me that is changing, as public opinion is negative on support.

Expand full comment

I thought that Trump's strategy was already well known. It was "leaked"a few months ago and again discussed in a recent post of Andrew Korybko. Basically, it seems to consist in threatening both sides if they don't stop the war. Zelensky would get no more American money if he doesn't concede. If Putin doesn't yield, Trump would deliver more and heavier weapons to Ukraine.

???

Expand full comment

Not sure that threatening Russia is a wise path—ask a parent about threats.

Expand full comment

The problem with that approach is that the 2nd option doesn't work WELL. It was already played out in many simulations during the Biden admin -

step one: US put in conventional missiles handled and targeted by US specialists on Ukrainian soil with assistance of US satellites that attack really essential Russian installations like 1000km away.

step two: Russians reply with conventional rocket attacks on really important US installations in Poland, Romania, Denmark and Germany.

Then what?

Expand full comment

I agree. I hope that Trump will opt in favor of another plan - and a better one at that.

Expand full comment

The Aegis Ashore installations in Poland & Romania are on the table.

Expand full comment

not sure they are... although the Russians want a negotiation over nuclear weapons

Expand full comment

You got it. Russia knows better than to try and deal with those inf your face, hot button issues.. Go after the big fish that are existential instead.

Expand full comment