COVID/vaccine nutjobs really gobble this stuff up. They're not "skeptics." Several of these accounts subscribe to Substack's craziest, reality-bending "anti-establishment" grifters. Nice!
The truth is not Russophilic, it is simply the truth.
This is a hard material fact that you, the delusional rusophobes have failed to understand during years.
The truth was always the same, Russia always had the industrial capacity to win the war, and have the motivation, not only for security but because of the raw truth that the Ukrainians or the east are Russian and for its media is really easy to portrait the war as defending innocent donnesk people and so on.
Now you, the rusophobes continue blind. Ok, go on, you are simply presenting the world to China.
Germany needed a lot of investment to modernise their industry, but hundred of millions were burnt in Ukraine, not in such modernising.
The US invested 40k in its own microelectronics industry and again 200 billion in Ukraine.
The result? China closest than ever.
You people are the kind of people that convince yourself that a stock is wonderful and continue buying it no matter what even if its tanking to the hell
Regarding the UK: Sadly, all the possible (i.e. likely to actually take power) potential leaders, regardless of party, are locked in on "Russia Bad". Our media and politics are all convinced Russia and China are our deadly enemies, and any sign of dissent from that opinion is not tolerated.
You only read things you agree with? Bad info-hygiene. A well-informed person needs to see a range of lies. Of which, for example, Ritter is a motherlode - you can bet on whatever he says being a paid-for falsehood. Hey though, I'm touched that you cared enough to look my feed up, shows you really care.
Substack is not the only thing in the world, friend, nor is the internet. Climb out of your silo and look around, you'll be surprised how broad the vista is.
Bullshit. UK media has putin-loving "russophiles" - especially in every "Comments" section online. And Elmo's Xitter +and the rest). They spout your style of sanctimonious aggrievement too.
I don't think you have seen the UK press and TV. Entirely Empire-simp. Perhaps you assume the alt-media people have any cut-through beyond the few hundred humans who follow them and believe what they say?
As someone who lives in the UK, I can assure you that there is not one single print or televisual news outlet in the UK which is even remotely sympathetic to Russia.
That's because your media hasn't been quite as thoroughly kremlin-poisoned yet. Your Fox-World mostly limits the outrage stoking to domestic issues But the kremlins workerbees are all up in there. GB News is trashy right wing drivel. Morning Star, Oriental Review, Russia Beyond (TV-Novosti) supplements in Telegraph and Daily Mail. Spike Magazine, George Galloway. Cunt Farage parroting vatnik "You made me hit you," victim blaming.
And "russophiles" all over most Comments sections: Cardiff University identified pro-Kremlin influence operations manipulating comment sections of 32 media outlets.
State media and putinistas have been whining for years about Russia being under attack "from all of NATO," while Russia's been ramping up attacks through Europe, provoking and ranting "false flag."
I wonder if this entire war is an attempt to change the subject and take the focus away from what the European leaders are actually doing to their countries: they are in fact attempting to destroy their countries with unlimited mass immigration of Muslims whose values are completely incompatible with those of Christian or Judeo-Christian western civilization. In fact, they are attempting to destroy western civilization using Muslims to do the dirty work for them.
As long as the leaders can focus on Putin as if Putin and Russia have all the bad qualities, they don't have to look at themselves and what they are doing to their countries.
By this I do not include leaders such Robert Fico or Viktor Orban. I mean the so-called leaders that insist that they must have this war and that America must furnish what the war needs.
These are people who would not have the support of their countrymen and women once the war ends and the topic comes around to life in their country and what their leaders have and have not done for them.
There is one thing about the war I don't understand, and that is who is the mastermind pushing and insisting on keeping it going? Who is pushing the leaders of Europe to act as if there is no peace plan EVER that they will sign onto? Who is pushing Zelenskyy to reject every single peace plan no matter what? It just seems to me there is something very purposeful behind the push to make war, and that someone or a group of individuals is very determined for their own reasons on continuing the death and destruction of human beings when peace is actually very possible. This does not seem random or accidental. The pattern of rejecting every peace offer seems quite simply, very purposeful and planned.
I don't really know, I'm just asking questions and putting ideas out there, hoping I will learn from other people. These things are difficult for all of us to figure out because the people involved do not want others to know what they are up to.
We will all sleep better at night and have healthier lives when the criminals are caught and have to face justice.
The people of the world should unite around this, because we all are vulnerable. Once those in government make the choice to be totalitarian, the people are sunk. And that can happen to any of us no matter what country we live in.
Quote: "saying they have the text of the plan and find it a good basis for concluding what Russia terms the Special Military Operation."
In the translation I read Putin said: "We have received this text through the existing communication channels with the US administration. I believe it could also serve as a foundation for a final peace settlement. However, it is not being discussed in detail with us. And I can guess why."
"could" and "foundation", not exactly an endorsement.
Seymour Hersh has asserted the Biden admin took out the Nord Stream, using Navy divers in cooperation with Norway. As far as I know he stands by this. Is this seen as credible by anyone else?
"with key defense bastions like Pokrovsk, soon to fall completely to the Russians."
Prokrovsk has fallen days ago, but hey....
and Putin would be eaten alive by his people if he accepted the deal since it's a deal that doesn't address the main roots of the conflict, namely Ukraine's right wing fraction and its hatred toward anything that's Russian. And then Russia is supposed to share some of their confiscated assets with the US? It's their Money in the first place.
Sounds like a plan where the US can claim it never had a hand in this and doesn't need to address its own responsibility. But hey that's nothing new for the US either....
Azov's wannabe-nazi contingent was a ragtag bunch of Girl Scouts compared to Russia's very active, violent "Russian nationalist" neo-Nazis - Several large militias have official representation in Russian Armed Forces. At least the Azovs are contrite about their ugly past.
This is probably an attempt by Trump to finally walk away from Ukraine and avoid his own Kabul moment. The question is - and we saw evidence of this after Alaska - can the Liberals (both US and European) convince Trump to stay with Ukraine. Trump's original instinct was to walk away but the Liberals keep bringing him back - only time will tell.
Trump's plan, at least what's publicly available, appears to address both the causes of this war and Russia's security concerns for the first time. Zelensky needs to be made an offer he can't refuse.
This plan is DOA because it will never be accepted by Ukraine, EU, UK and Russia, but it gives Trump administration perfect excuse to exit Ukraina conflict altohether. Trump administration is clearly overestimating capabily of USA to force its will upon others. The whole plan is 100% American wishlist to rob Russian and European money and deny Russia’s victory. This is not international politics or diplomacy but 100% PR hoax.
The biggest failure of any proposal put forth by any western country, is the presumption they and/or Ukraine are on similar footing (or equal partners, if you prefer) as Russia. The upper hand and all the leverage is Russia's alone.
The long-term Total War of increasing scale unleashed by the United States, with the subordinate support of the rest of the Western Empire, is designed to eliminate the possibility of hegemonic relief on a global scale and to maintain the Appropriation of the planet's wealth by that small imperial capitalist group. To achieve this, the confrontation against Russia began through Ukraine (“proxy war”) and a whole circle of blows and destabilization of its strategic environment and alliances, in addition to an economic war with very few precedents. To do this, it is promoting the expansionism of “Great Israel” in Western Asia and the permanent aggression against the anti-Zionist Axis of Resistance, which contemplates its last stage in the destruction (at least political) of Iran. All this while preparing the final confrontation against China.
It is in this last objective that we have to consider the very possible aggression against Venezuela. The United States needs to have its rear covered for this colossal war challenge. That is, leaving the entire American continent and its interoceanic routes clear of possible “internal enemies” and beachheads.
That is why Trump wants to end the war in Ukraine, and he is already defeated in it.
Obviously some points have little to do with Ukraine.
None of the clauses/points are in a form and wording that can be implemented without considerable disagreement and conflict, so at best it may become the BASIS of an actual Agreement... rather than the Plan by one of the main Parties to the conflict.
Once the Principles are agreed upon, the backroom wordsmiths will have to find a way to make it clear how it will be implemented in practice. At present, much of it is fantasy.
One day, Stephen Bryen wrote that NATO was planning to send forces to Ukraine (in russian agenda they have been doing so for three years and still haven't even put a boots on😂). The next day, the US-Russian plan for Ukrainian capitulation was revealed.
Please Israeli-Russian agent wouldn't you have a problem writing that the sun is blue one day and green the next if it meant fitting in with Russian disinformation?
21 or 28 points ? Anyway this paper confirms the role of Zelensky as the tool in continuing the war of Biden's US Zionist neocons on Europe, and now on what is left of the EU. + revenge for the empty promises of Biden and Bojo. But why target Poland. The "West", a contest in duplicity, a basket of crabs. Who still would want to be part of it?
COVID/vaccine nutjobs really gobble this stuff up. They're not "skeptics." Several of these accounts subscribe to Substack's craziest, reality-bending "anti-establishment" grifters. Nice!
Do any of your vatnik "readers" cough up for your rehashed "russophilic" fodder, Stevie?
The truth is not Russophilic, it is simply the truth.
This is a hard material fact that you, the delusional rusophobes have failed to understand during years.
The truth was always the same, Russia always had the industrial capacity to win the war, and have the motivation, not only for security but because of the raw truth that the Ukrainians or the east are Russian and for its media is really easy to portrait the war as defending innocent donnesk people and so on.
Now you, the rusophobes continue blind. Ok, go on, you are simply presenting the world to China.
Germany needed a lot of investment to modernise their industry, but hundred of millions were burnt in Ukraine, not in such modernising.
The US invested 40k in its own microelectronics industry and again 200 billion in Ukraine.
The result? China closest than ever.
You people are the kind of people that convince yourself that a stock is wonderful and continue buying it no matter what even if its tanking to the hell
You are hilarious.
To be hilarious in the eyes of a clown is something to be proud of.
Regarding the UK: Sadly, all the possible (i.e. likely to actually take power) potential leaders, regardless of party, are locked in on "Russia Bad". Our media and politics are all convinced Russia and China are our deadly enemies, and any sign of dissent from that opinion is not tolerated.
You couldn't be more bloated with Russian horseshit if you tried. All the best heros - Truth Teller Scotty Ritter - https://substack.com/@bindoner/following
https://substack.com/@bindoner/reads
You only read things you agree with? Bad info-hygiene. A well-informed person needs to see a range of lies. Of which, for example, Ritter is a motherlode - you can bet on whatever he says being a paid-for falsehood. Hey though, I'm touched that you cared enough to look my feed up, shows you really care.
Nice try but you eat only "alt" shit - seemingly uninterested in anything conventional. But maybe you were just born with all of that knowledge.
And those "likes" must just be for the lulz.
Substack is not the only thing in the world, friend, nor is the internet. Climb out of your silo and look around, you'll be surprised how broad the vista is.
Bullshit. UK media has putin-loving "russophiles" - especially in every "Comments" section online. And Elmo's Xitter +and the rest). They spout your style of sanctimonious aggrievement too.
I don't think you have seen the UK press and TV. Entirely Empire-simp. Perhaps you assume the alt-media people have any cut-through beyond the few hundred humans who follow them and believe what they say?
As someone who lives in the UK, I can assure you that there is not one single print or televisual news outlet in the UK which is even remotely sympathetic to Russia.
That's because your media hasn't been quite as thoroughly kremlin-poisoned yet. Your Fox-World mostly limits the outrage stoking to domestic issues But the kremlins workerbees are all up in there. GB News is trashy right wing drivel. Morning Star, Oriental Review, Russia Beyond (TV-Novosti) supplements in Telegraph and Daily Mail. Spike Magazine, George Galloway. Cunt Farage parroting vatnik "You made me hit you," victim blaming.
And "russophiles" all over most Comments sections: Cardiff University identified pro-Kremlin influence operations manipulating comment sections of 32 media outlets.
https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/news/view/2547048-high-profile-western-media-outlets-repeatedly-infiltrated-by-pro-kremlin-trolls
And that was before launching the full scale expansionist war, and all of Putin's provocative hybrid fuckery.
State media and putinistas have been whining for years about Russia being under attack "from all of NATO," while Russia's been ramping up attacks through Europe, provoking and ranting "false flag."
What is there to be "sympathetic" with?
I wonder if this entire war is an attempt to change the subject and take the focus away from what the European leaders are actually doing to their countries: they are in fact attempting to destroy their countries with unlimited mass immigration of Muslims whose values are completely incompatible with those of Christian or Judeo-Christian western civilization. In fact, they are attempting to destroy western civilization using Muslims to do the dirty work for them.
As long as the leaders can focus on Putin as if Putin and Russia have all the bad qualities, they don't have to look at themselves and what they are doing to their countries.
By this I do not include leaders such Robert Fico or Viktor Orban. I mean the so-called leaders that insist that they must have this war and that America must furnish what the war needs.
These are people who would not have the support of their countrymen and women once the war ends and the topic comes around to life in their country and what their leaders have and have not done for them.
There is one thing about the war I don't understand, and that is who is the mastermind pushing and insisting on keeping it going? Who is pushing the leaders of Europe to act as if there is no peace plan EVER that they will sign onto? Who is pushing Zelenskyy to reject every single peace plan no matter what? It just seems to me there is something very purposeful behind the push to make war, and that someone or a group of individuals is very determined for their own reasons on continuing the death and destruction of human beings when peace is actually very possible. This does not seem random or accidental. The pattern of rejecting every peace offer seems quite simply, very purposeful and planned.
Thank you,
I don't really know, I'm just asking questions and putting ideas out there, hoping I will learn from other people. These things are difficult for all of us to figure out because the people involved do not want others to know what they are up to.
We will all sleep better at night and have healthier lives when the criminals are caught and have to face justice.
The people of the world should unite around this, because we all are vulnerable. Once those in government make the choice to be totalitarian, the people are sunk. And that can happen to any of us no matter what country we live in.
Quote: "saying they have the text of the plan and find it a good basis for concluding what Russia terms the Special Military Operation."
In the translation I read Putin said: "We have received this text through the existing communication channels with the US administration. I believe it could also serve as a foundation for a final peace settlement. However, it is not being discussed in detail with us. And I can guess why."
"could" and "foundation", not exactly an endorsement.
Seymour Hersh has asserted the Biden admin took out the Nord Stream, using Navy divers in cooperation with Norway. As far as I know he stands by this. Is this seen as credible by anyone else?
Hersh has zero credibility
You think he was fooled or is lying?
It was, as the German investigation has found so far, Ukrainian special forces helped by Poland, probably GROM.
Very interesting that unlike Poland blocking the German investigation, Meloni's Italy has now decided not to block it.
"with key defense bastions like Pokrovsk, soon to fall completely to the Russians."
Prokrovsk has fallen days ago, but hey....
and Putin would be eaten alive by his people if he accepted the deal since it's a deal that doesn't address the main roots of the conflict, namely Ukraine's right wing fraction and its hatred toward anything that's Russian. And then Russia is supposed to share some of their confiscated assets with the US? It's their Money in the first place.
Sounds like a plan where the US can claim it never had a hand in this and doesn't need to address its own responsibility. But hey that's nothing new for the US either....
Please tell us more about "Ukraine's right wing faction." And about Rusich and all of the other Russian wannabe-nazis.
A-z-o-v
Azov's wannabe-nazi contingent was a ragtag bunch of Girl Scouts compared to Russia's very active, violent "Russian nationalist" neo-Nazis - Several large militias have official representation in Russian Armed Forces. At least the Azovs are contrite about their ugly past.
Ukranian mouse, meet Russian elephant, fascist-loving Orwellian warmonger.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rusich_Group?wprov=sfla1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Nazism_in_Russia?wprov=sfla1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruscism?wprov=sfla1
This is probably an attempt by Trump to finally walk away from Ukraine and avoid his own Kabul moment. The question is - and we saw evidence of this after Alaska - can the Liberals (both US and European) convince Trump to stay with Ukraine. Trump's original instinct was to walk away but the Liberals keep bringing him back - only time will tell.
It’s past time to end this
Conspiracy loon weighs in. Thanks.
Trump's plan, at least what's publicly available, appears to address both the causes of this war and Russia's security concerns for the first time. Zelensky needs to be made an offer he can't refuse.
"Trump's plan" is a straight up pootie poot production - complete with awkward translation quirks.
This plan is DOA because it will never be accepted by Ukraine, EU, UK and Russia, but it gives Trump administration perfect excuse to exit Ukraina conflict altohether. Trump administration is clearly overestimating capabily of USA to force its will upon others. The whole plan is 100% American wishlist to rob Russian and European money and deny Russia’s victory. This is not international politics or diplomacy but 100% PR hoax.
The biggest failure of any proposal put forth by any western country, is the presumption they and/or Ukraine are on similar footing (or equal partners, if you prefer) as Russia. The upper hand and all the leverage is Russia's alone.
In what universe?
The long-term Total War of increasing scale unleashed by the United States, with the subordinate support of the rest of the Western Empire, is designed to eliminate the possibility of hegemonic relief on a global scale and to maintain the Appropriation of the planet's wealth by that small imperial capitalist group. To achieve this, the confrontation against Russia began through Ukraine (“proxy war”) and a whole circle of blows and destabilization of its strategic environment and alliances, in addition to an economic war with very few precedents. To do this, it is promoting the expansionism of “Great Israel” in Western Asia and the permanent aggression against the anti-Zionist Axis of Resistance, which contemplates its last stage in the destruction (at least political) of Iran. All this while preparing the final confrontation against China.
It is in this last objective that we have to consider the very possible aggression against Venezuela. The United States needs to have its rear covered for this colossal war challenge. That is, leaving the entire American continent and its interoceanic routes clear of possible “internal enemies” and beachheads.
That is why Trump wants to end the war in Ukraine, and he is already defeated in it.
Needs more unhinged bluster.
Others are calling it a 28 Point Plan.
Obviously some points have little to do with Ukraine.
None of the clauses/points are in a form and wording that can be implemented without considerable disagreement and conflict, so at best it may become the BASIS of an actual Agreement... rather than the Plan by one of the main Parties to the conflict.
Once the Principles are agreed upon, the backroom wordsmiths will have to find a way to make it clear how it will be implemented in practice. At present, much of it is fantasy.
Several of the clauses/points use awkward English wording, making obvious it was shit out by KD & Krew for Witless Witkoff, funky translation.
Trump's Ukraine-Russia peace plan does have 28 points.
https://www.axios.com/2025/11/20/trump-ukraine-peace-plan-28-points-russia
I think the Israel-Gaza-Hamas peace plan had 21 points.
A few weeks ago in the Big Ten Nebraska beat UCLA 28-21. Go Huskers!
https://www.huskermax.com/game/2025-ucla-football/
Welcome back to reality, Stephen, after your brief flirtation with NATO Russophobia.
"There is more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent."
One day, Stephen Bryen wrote that NATO was planning to send forces to Ukraine (in russian agenda they have been doing so for three years and still haven't even put a boots on😂). The next day, the US-Russian plan for Ukrainian capitulation was revealed.
Please Israeli-Russian agent wouldn't you have a problem writing that the sun is blue one day and green the next if it meant fitting in with Russian disinformation?
21 or 28 points ? Anyway this paper confirms the role of Zelensky as the tool in continuing the war of Biden's US Zionist neocons on Europe, and now on what is left of the EU. + revenge for the empty promises of Biden and Bojo. But why target Poland. The "West", a contest in duplicity, a basket of crabs. Who still would want to be part of it?