Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TedTheKitty's avatar

This was certainly a timely article and very informative. After you posted this I saw a story about Niger: one of the men from the new coup government gave a statement on Niger's state TV channel. He stated that at 6:30 am (I'm assuming the morning of the 9th), French troops "attacked" the Niger National Guard, released jihadists from incarceration and violated Niger airspace with an "airlift". Probably due to translation the story is a bit murky (at least to me). I haven't seen anything further about it today (at least yet, anyway). On the 8th, while I was plane-geeking I saw an Italian Air Force C130-J leave Pisa and land in Niamey. I noticed it because I thought that Niger announced the airspace was "closed".

What worries me about US/western intervention is just how the decision makers in Washington define "national security". Yesterday the Economist ran a story about the coup in Niger, rather framing it as leading to a "global threat" of terrorism, even eluding to jihadists from the Sahel attacking the US proper. It would seem much more likely to me that the migration of jihadists from that area to Europe - just due to geography - would be more likely, IF it even took place.

As you explained about the amount and type of actual weapons belonging to the military in Niger, that may be enough to take the presidential structure/capital but if I was going to perform a coup & take over the country, I'd certainly want a much bigger arsenal to hold onto it!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?