Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J.Davis's avatar

There is no evidence that "the Chinese are increasingly angry with Iran". Reuters is a western info-war shop and the "anonymous Iranian officials and people familiar with the matter" is Jake Sullivan sending a text message to a Reuters journalist. Nor is the belt and road "collapsing". I don't know why Americans insist on living in a fantasy world. We must engage things as they are. China's interests are entirely aligned with the erosion of American power that is taking place in Arabia, and this is in turn aligned with the interests of Iran and Russia. A short term decline in trade is absolutely worth a permanent decline in American power. If the US wishes to remain hegemonic it needs to a dramatic shift in strategy.

Expand full comment
Peter Nayland Kust's avatar

It has been evident for weeks based on shipping rates and crude oil prices that Iran's proxy attacks on Red Sea shipping via the Houthis was doing more damage to Russia and China than to Israel and the United States.

https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/hamas-v-israel-who-is-taking-iran

If the US can avoid falling into the trap of turning the conflict into another US war in the Middle East, the economic pressures should force Beijing to act as interlocutor to get Tehran to rein in the Houthis.

Not giving Iran the escalation that it wants is what is needed here. Let Iran and it's proxies be the ones taking the conflict up a notch.

Expand full comment
52 more comments...

No posts