The German government is under heavy pressure to send Taurus missiles to Ukraine. Or to be more precise, the German Chancellor, Olaf Scholz is the one being pushed by his own Defense and Foreign Ministers, with Annalena Baerbock, his foreign minister, giving speeches pushing for the Taurus missiles to go there.
The Taurus cruise missile is a long range weapon that would need to be mounted on a Ukrainian fighter jet, most likely the Su-24 which is currently equipped with the British Storm Shadow cruise missile. Probably appropriate interfaces would need to be installed on the Ukrainian jets.
How can a government survive when it is completely fractured? Why would a Chancellor allow this kind of opposition in his governing ranks?
Part of it is because Germany is led by a coalition government that is wobbling badly. His fellow senior officials know that Scholz is a pushover: all you have to do is provide some political cover for him. He resisted sending Leopards to Ukraine until the US “persuaded” him by agreeing to send Abrams M-1 tanks along with the Leopards.
David Cameron, once Britain's Prime Minister and now Foreign Minister, proposed a solution. Britain would send more Storm Shadow cruise missiles to Ukraine and Germany would supply Taurus missiles to replace them in the UK. This scheme sounded promising, but Scholz did not like it. His foreign minister, on the other hand, endorsed Cameron’s proposal.
A vexing question is just how many of the Taurus missiles actually are in working condition. Reliable numbers are hard to come by, but some reckon that Germany has 600 Taurus cruise missiles (in different models) in its inventory. Only 150 or so are certified operational, although that number may be an exaggeration. Germany may be asked to send between 30 and 50 Taurus missiles to Ukraine, significantly depleting the working inventory.
One presumes that Germany needs Taurus missiles for its own national security, although how many is not clear. Those boosting sending them to Ukraine, like the Green Party (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) are all-in on sending these weapons to Ukraine, but are far less committed on defense spending in Germany. Annalena Baerbock is a leading Green party member. She favors a European defense scheme under the supervision of the European parliament.
Scholz says that a key reason he opposes sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine, even though he "trusts the Ukrainians," is that German soldiers would have to operate them. This, Scholz suggests, makes Germany a combatant against Russia, a result he does not support.
No one doubts that sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine would aid and abet Ukraine's attacks on Russian territory, which have escalated in the past couple of weeks, leaving aside the obvious target of the Kerch Strait mega bridge which, according to the leak of a tape of German military officers, 20 Taurus missiles would be aimed at it. On March 12th alone, Ukraine sent 58 kamikaze drones aimed at six locations.
The Ukrainians have been aiming at Russian oil refineries (two of them were hit on March 12) and an attempted strike on a nuclear power plant in Rostov. The Rostov plant includes three power units and generates 3.1 gw (gigawatts) of electricity.
An attack on a nuclear power plant is extraordinarily reckless and has repercussions that could escalate the war with new terror weapons, including nuclear weapons. Scholz's statement that he "trusts the Ukrainians" seems misplaced.
Ukraine's attacks grow out of desperation, as Ukraine's military is steadily eroding and the Russians are thought to be on the verge of a major offensive. The Ukrainians are urgently building new defenses consisting of trenches, pill boxes and obstacles, but if the Russians actually do move a large force either the new defense works will be bypassed or destroyed.
Russian President Vladimir Putin strongly warned the west about nuclear weapons. Putin conflated nuclear weapons with the possible introduction of US troops in Ukraine, saying that the west should be aware that Russia is "technically ready for nuclear war and that if the U.S. sent troops to Ukraine, it would be considered a significant escalation of the conflict." Putin's statement came before the attack in Rostov. It isn't known how Russia will respond to that attack.
There will be an upcoming vote in the German Bundestag, staged by the opposition, on the Taurus question. Previously the Bundestag voted against sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine. How such a vote will turn out, given the fissures in the German government, is not clear.
UPDATE: The Bundestag (lower house) voted 495 votes to 190, with five abstentions against the opposition motion on sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine. This is the second time the Bundestag has voted against doing so, strengthening Scholz’s position and rejecting the Green party insurrection.
To answer your question: yes. And yes, those Taurus missiles will be operated by sheep-dipped german crews.
Germany loves to do this dance where they feign reluctance to escalate but an American snaps his fingers and european knees hit the floor with a resounding Thwack!
The "Release The Leopards!" fiasco was most instructive.
Anyway:
https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/104192
“Macron will make an urgent address to the French nation tomorrow on the war in Ukraine
Earlier, the country’s parliament approved the French president’s strategy towards Ukraine and supported the bilateral security agreement signed by Macron and Zelenskyy.
📰 Le Monde”
No, it won’t be popular. Macron doesn’t care, and germany will be forced to go along. No, a French/Polish/Czech expeditionary force will not be decisive (nor will Taurus missiles) but if you think that the escalation will end there, then you are high.
WWIII is coming.
The Houthis are attacking the ships of enemies of Russia, this needs to be factored in. When was the last time an enemy of NATO blocked a major sea lane?