Discover more from Weapons and Strategy
China Alarmed As US Marine Prepare HIMARS and ATACMS for Yonaguni
Finally the Biden Administration is working with Japan, but is it too late?
China is now alarmed that the US and Japan are planning to put HIMARS in the Nansei islands close to Taiwan. My colleagues and I proposed that deployment two years ago in newspaper articles, videos and in a book edited by Lt. General Earl Hailston (USMC, retired) and myself called Stopping a Taiwan Invasion. In the latest news published first by the Kyodo News Service, Japan has now agreed to the deployment and the Biden administration has acquiesced to proposals made by the US Marines.
How to defend Taiwan from a threatened Taiwan invasion is a non-trivial military problem. Taiwan is close to the Chinese mainland and China has overwhelming force. But China, too, has a couple of problems. On the tactical level, China will have to send troops to invade Taiwan. It can do so with paratroopers, but that tactic can be stopped by Taiwan's military. Or it can send an invasion force by sea, something it has been practicing to do.
It is the sea invasion that is behind the US Marine Corps' deployment to the Nansei islands, specifically to Yonaguni. Yonaguni is the island closest to Taiwan. It is the only island with an airfield that is suitable to accommodate C-130's that can transport HIMARS units and ammunition, as well as supplies. There is adequate room to move HIMARS around (it is a road-mobile system) to make it difficult for the Chinese Air Force of Chinese missiles to accurately target them. The only missing ingredient are adequate air defenses for the deployment, something in need of urgent remedy.
HIMARS with ATACMS can be used to strike invasion ships. The range of ATACMS (190 miles) is more than double the distance of Yonaguni from Taiwan, and covers the main routes the Chinese can use to launch an operation.
The US decided to send ATACMS to Ukraine, authorizing strikes on Russian territory. This will have almost no real military impact in a land war because the Russians have learned how to intercept ATACMS strikes fairly efficiently and in the first dozen or so ATACMS launches in Kursk and elsewhere on Russia's territory, not much has been achieved other than to anger the Russians. The Ukrainian result therefore is quite poor, and it wastes ATACMS missiles which are in short supply. For example, Taiwan ordered both HIMARS and ATACMS and has only now been getting a few after long delays. We don't know what is in reserve in the Pacific, but one could guess that the administration is taking a huge risk supplying ATACMS and HIMARS to Ukraine. As this is written, Russia says it has destroyed five HIMARS launchers in Ukraine, probably more than so far have arrived in Taiwan. (So far, 11 HIMARS launchers have been approved for Taiwan, with additional orders expected.)
Washington needs to get its act in order regarding Ukraine. Ukraine is marginal to US long term interests as it has no direct political, economic or military importance to US security. Taiwan and Japan, as well as Korea, are entirely different matters, as Pacific security is important to checking Chinese power, supporting US economic interests, and demonstrating we can protect allies and friends where concrete interests are at stake.
The question is, do we have enough supplies of vital equipment to deter China?
Below is my 2022 article published on Weapons and Strategy.
Yonaguni and HIMARS
A Bridge too far for Biden?
Dec 29, 2022
Yonaguni is a small island, part of the Ryukyus island chain, that is close to Taiwan. In our book Stopping a Taiwan Invasion we suggested putting HIMARS on Yonaguni. It seems the Biden administration, despite support from the Marines, is opposing HIMARS for Yonaguni. That has left the Marines out of the picture for the moment. Japan, however, wants to stay in the game and is increasingly worried that China will not only attack Taiwan, but will also try and take over the thinly defended Ryukyus islands. This would give China an important strategic advantage, controlling not only vital sea lines of communications, but confronting US Air Force and Marine operations on Okinawa.
Thanks for reading Weapons and Strategy! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Subscribed
HIMARS is a highly accurate multiple launch missile system based on wheeled vehicles, so it can shoot and scoot. It has proven effective and lethal in the Ukraine war. The Russians have had major problems trying to counter HIMARS and, despite their claims, it seems they have succeeded in hitting few, if any, of the deployed HINMARS launchers.
HIMARS can also hit moving targets including ships at sea, meaning that HIMARS could play an important role in destroying Chinese forces invading Taiwan. For China to be successful it has to launch a massive amphibious assault. While HIMARS can’t do it alone —Taiwan will deploy its air force and shore based defenses (and has also ordered HIMARS although none have yet been delivered)— it can create major problems for a Chinese-launched invasion.
Japan does not have HIMARS. It does have a tracked multiple launched rocket system, but Japan’s system would need to be upgraded to handle HIMARS rockets, especially the all-important long range HIMARS rocket known as ATACMS (MGM-140). The immediate problem is that ATACMS is out of production and existing ATACMS are undergoing a life extension program.
ATACMS
ATACMS has a range of 190 miles. Yonaguni is only 67 miles from Taiwan and the range of ATACMS is ideal for knocking out a Chinese amphibious attack.
The US plans to replace ATACMS with a new long range missile designated as Long Range Precision Fire (PrSM). But PrSM won’t be available until 2023 and will not be fully capable until 2025. This leaves a two-fold gap —a gap in existing stocks as insufficient for a major contingency, and a gap in product replacement.
The Japanese currently intend to put modern air defenses on Yonaguni and also will deploy Type 12 anti-ship missiles. These missiles can be launched from ships or from the ground. They have significant range (that can be extended to 185 miles). While liquid fueled they are cannister launched, making rapid response possible. The Type 12 is not as good as HIMARS ATACMS, but it puts a capability on Yonaguni that is badly needed.
Type 12 Anti-ship missile system
It isn’t clear why the Biden administration decided against the recommendation of the Marines to put HIMARS units on Yonaguni. There is a growing suspicion that Biden is trying to go soft on China and is also delaying the delivery of essential war material to Taiwan. While the administration announces new arms sales for Taiwan, the latest this week, it then “discovers” there are unanticipated delays. Even the new F-16s for Taiwan are delayed and no one knows if, and when, they will be delivered to the island.
Meanwhile, Japan has picked up the ball as best it can. For the first time Japan is significantly upping its defense expenditures and it is stepping up political contacts with Taiwan, much to the chagrin of China.
In March, 2018 then emperor Heisei (Tsugu) Akihito and Empress Michiko visited Yonaguni for the first time, in order to “wave at" Taiwan. Their joint visit was an important signal to Japan’s government. It has taken four years and a growingly powerful and threatening China to move Japan to take steps to protect itself and its interests and, most of all, not to depend on the United States. Emperor Akihito resigned in April, 2019 because of failing health. Now 89 years old, he ought to be pleased to see that Yonaguni will not only be defended, but it will help Japan strengthen its defenses in this troubled region.
This leaves the Biden administration with a policy that looks like a not-so-silent retreat. This is bad news for Taiwan, for Japan and for regional security.
Here is why your article is shocking:
You have cited the Taiwan Relations Act a 'justification' for your position regarding China.
The Taiwan Relations Act was merely concerning the U.S. Government and NOT America's relations with China and with its province of Taiwan. It is logically SUBORDINATE TO the Shanghai Communique, which is an agreement BETWEEN China and U.S. Anything in the Taiwan Relations Act that contradicts the Shanghai Communique of 1972 is null and void automatically.
The Shanghai Communique, in 1972, committed the U.S. Government to -- and agreed with China's Government that -- "Taiwan is a part of China." Consistently since the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the official policy of the U.S. Government is and has been "Taiwan is a part of China."
Your article logically implied, instead of overtly said, that Taiwan can declare independence from China — DESPITE BEING “a part of China. Here is the (il)logic of your position:
Your article alleges that Taiwan should be able to declare independence from China despite America’s Government having formally committed itself that Taiwan is a part of China, and that U.S. taxpayers should fund this U.S. aggression against China.
Furthermore, you are assuming (likewise falsely) that Taiwan is of such vital national-security interest to the safety of America (protecting the safety of the residents in the USA), so that America, which is legally committed to Taiwan’s being a Chinese province, ought to arm Taiwan so that Taiwan can declare itself to be NOT a part of China, so that China can then be defeated by LOSING that “part of China.” That’s what you want. You want U.S. taxpayers to fund this U.S. aggression against China. It is crazy. It is loaded with false assumptions. And the very IDEA that U.S. taxpayers should fund U.S. aggression isn't merely crazy, it is evil, and I, as a U.,S. taxpayer, recognize this.
How about America stay out of foreign entanglements?