Discover more from Weapons and Strategy
I was interviewed today by the Jewish Policy Center for their weekly Webinar.
In that interview I reviewed the evidence thus far available concerning the crash of Yevgeny Prigozhin’s aircraft north of Moscow. The bottom line, ruling out a pure accident, is that Prigozhin and his team were probably liquidated by the GRU, not by Putin.
Below is the Press Release that summarizes some of the main points in the interview:
Video: Russia, Wagner and War Featuring Stephen Bryen
Stephen Bryen • August 24, 2023
JEWISH POLICY CENTER
Stephen Bryen believes Yevgeny Prigozhin, leader of Russia’s Wagner group mercenary army, died in the wreckage of one of his private planes on August 23. Some early news reports noted speculation Prighozin might not have been aboard.
Bryen also strongly suspects that the plane was shot down, not felled by a bomb smuggled on board or mechanical accident. But he is not sure Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the spectacular assassination of his ally-turned-challenger.
A former senior Pentagon official and defense industry executive, Bryen thinks Russia’s military intelligence agency, the GRU, had the means and motive to act with or without Putin’s prior endorsement.
Speaking to a Jewish Policy Center webinar August 24, the writer of Substack’s “Weapons and Strategy” column, whose work also appears in Asia Times, Newsweek, The Washington Times and elsewhere, said images of the private jet’s wreckage seemed to show shrapnel holes in the remains of one wing. “You wouldn’t get shrapnel from an explosion on the plane … you would get it from anti-aircraft missiles.”
Bryen said “the plane was flying at 28,000 feet and still climbing.” Only certain ground-to-air missiles like those of the Russian SS-20 system—not to mention fighter aircraft—would have been able to blast it out of the sky 100 miles northwest of Moscow. The regular Russian military possesses SS20s in the region of the crash. “The GRU has them too,” Bryen said.
“My speculation is that the GRU [Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation] wanted to take back control from Wagner,” he added. The mercenary group, active on the Kremlin’s behalf in Africa and Syria, took the lead from the regular army in the nine-month battle for Bakhmut in eastern Ukraine, Bryen said. While it lost many from its reported peak total of 50,000 troops, Wagner eventually drove back a larger Ukrainian force.
Prigozhin and Wagner embarrassed and undermined the regular military, and Putin, with a short-lived mutiny and abortive march on Moscow in June. In the aftermath, in exchange for giving Prigozhin and Wagner the choice of merging into the army or deploying to Belarus,
“Putin had promised to protect Prigozhin,” Bryen said. The two grew up in the same Leningrad (now again St. Petersburg) neighborhood. Bryen noted that the pair previously cooperated and Prighozin, once imprisoned for years as a thief, used a catering empire as a platform for a private army useful to Putin.
Bryen, who twice received the Pentagon’s highest civilian award, said former President Bill Clinton observed that “Putin keeps his promises. … So, if he promised to protect Prighozin, he probably tried to.” At the time of the plane crash, Putin had been in Kursk, celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Soviet Union’s World War II victory over Nazi Germany in a battle there. “He was hustled back to Moscow … and beyond that we don’t know anything.”
The GRU “is much more powerful than the FSB [Federal Security Service, successor to the KGB intelligence/secret police],” he said. “It’s not like our DIA [Defense Intelligence Agency],” which is primarily analytical, Bryen noted. “GRU is analytical and operational. … Its special forces are big.”
Prigozhin’s elimination, along with his number two, Dmitry Utkin, a former Russian army officer and Wagner’s actual founding leader, helps restore Putin’s image that was tarnished by the mercenaries’ rebellion. “But if it’s true that it was not, he who ordered this … he has to watch his back,” Bryen said.
Meanwhile, Russia’s war against Ukraine may be tilting in its favor. Bryen said the Russian army has trained 250,000 to 350,000 reserves. “It now has approximately 100,000 [troops] in Ukraine” and, with Kyiv’s anticipated spring-summer offensive apparently failed, Bryen does not think Moscow needs Wagner mercenaries there.
The fighting “has cost Ukraine huge amounts of troops and equipment … including Western equipment.” Bryen thinks the war “is getting more and more difficult for Ukraine.” The longer it takes to negotiate a settlement, “the more territory Russia will take.” He believes talks will happen soon.
Bryen called the massive aid provided by the United States and NATO allies to Ukraine unprecedented in modern times and noted “some argue it leaves us naked elsewhere in the world” instead of by example strengthening U.S. deterrence against China, Iran, North Korean and others.
Tension between Poland and Belarus may be reduced with Wagner troops apparently out of the latter. Polish forces “are much better than Belarus’ troops,” Bryen said. In addition, “the Poles have their own ambitions, let’s be honest. … If for some reason the Ukrainian government collapses, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Poland take the Lviv region” from Ukraine “and the Russians not do much about it.”
https://www.jewishpolicycenter.org/2023/08/24/upcoming-webinar-you-come-at-the-king-you-best-not-miss/
Thanks for sharing your take on this!
I've seen others comment that Putin wouldn't do this so near Moscow, or wouldn't do this during the BRICs summit, and similar opinons with regard to appearances. My take is that this was a serious military threat to the government and that exactly where and when the Wagner leadership was taken out was a secondary consideration to getting it done right in terms of execution. And this seems to have been executed perfectly in that the Wagner leadership, not just Prigozhin, was eliminated all at once. There were no survivors or missteps in indentifying the targets, and that is not easy to do. Better to do it near Moscow where Putin/GRU/FSB has more control over events than to try to do this in Africa or Belarus or somewhere else and have it not go so smoothly. Competence is much more important in terms of the government's reputation than whether or not the location or timing is perfect.
not sure GRU would act on something like this without Putin's approval. I do agree that taking Prigozhin and Co out was not in Putin's interest. The vertical of power is very tight in Russian (especially now), MOD is in complete sync w Putin (Shoygu is one of Putin's trusted friends as well), GRU is within that structure reporting to Gerasimov. I just don't see how GRU can go rogue on this one. This is just not the same environment as with CIA in the US running its operations independently